Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Clarifying What's Passive

By Rebecca LuElla Miller

Instruction manuals and conference workshop teachers say to avoid passive voice, and there's a good reason to do so, but in order to follow that bit of advice, we need to have a clear idea what we're talking about. As it turns out, writers of all stripes -- including experienced novelists, MFA grads, freelance writers, and editors -- can be confused about the term "passive" when used in reference to writing.

Passive voice is a grammatical term identifying a particular subject/verb relationship---a specialized one that runs counter to the usual active voice.

Typically, the subject of a sentence is the agent that does the action of a sentence. In the examples below, the subject of each of these simple sentences is the agent doing the action.

  • The writer cleaned off her desk. [Who cleaned? writer]
  • The editor marked the final page of the manuscript. [Who marked? editor.]
  • The publisher congratulated the team on a job well-done. [Who congratulated? publisher.
 In sentences utilizing the passive voice, however, the subject is actually the recipient of the action. Again, examples may be helpful.

  • The book was published by WaterBrook. [The subject book is the object of the action was published rather than the agent doing the action.]
  • The email was sent from her phone. [The subject email is the object of the action was sent rather than the agent doing the action.]
  • Another writer was added to the group without advance warning. [The subject writer is the object of the action was added rather than the agent doing the action.]
Writing instructors discourage passive voice. Since the subject is, for all practical purposes, supine, there's not much for a reader to see in a sentence with a passive verb. Sentences, like good stories, need action. They need an agent who goes out and makes something happen. Passive characters make for boring stories, and passive subjects make for boring sentences.

So far, so good.

But here's where problems start cropping up. Some writers (and even some editors) have taken the concept of active subjects to mean that all sentences must have action verbs. Any verb of being, then, gets lumped in with the passive voice. Here are a few sentences with verbs of being.


  • Despite everything that happened, the speaker still wasn't late to the conference.
  • Her children are all gifted writers, singers, or artists.
  • I am certain about this one.
In each of these sentences, there is no action, so consequently, the subject is not passively standing by having some action foisted upon it. Rather, these sentences identify a condition or a state the subject is in. These are legitimate sentences and perform necessary functions in our writing. Still, they play a minor role and should not be overused.

Another form that gets dumped in with passive voice, and isn't, is a helping verb working with a present participle (-ing form of a verb).


  • The writer is finishing the last chapter.
  • Her friend was posting on Facebook late at night.
  • The members of his critique group were giving line edits instead of overall impressions.
This kind of sentence is clearly not passive. In each of the examples the subject is the agent doing the action, and there is a strong action verb.

Is there a reason to steer clear of these sentences? Perhaps, but for an entirely different reason than for the erroneous accusation that they are passive.

Sentences with ongoing action, which is what this verb construction communicates, are a little harder for readers to visualize. The beginning of a thing, we can picture, but what do we see when the action is ongoing?

In addition, if an entire paragraph or page or scene contains numerous sentences with this construction, the repeated -ing acts like any other repetition: it becomes annoying.


Believe it or not, there's one more sentence construction that gets accused of being passive, and it is innocent of the charge. These sentences are the ugly ducklings of writing. They have everything wrong with them -- no action verb, the subject in the wrong place, and a bland, unspecific word up front. I'm talking about sentences that start with There is or Here are and the like.

  • There were three Facebook friend invitations in her email box.
  • Here is your coffee.
  • There aren't any more books available.
These sentences are as legitimate as any other. They serve a necessary purpose, but like other sentences with verbs of being, they should not be overused.

So here's what we covered:


  • Sentences with verbs in passive voice aren't as strong as verbs in active voice. A writer would be wise to rewrite them.
  • Sentences with state of being verbs are perfectly fine but shouldn't be overused.
  • Sentences with helping verbs and the present participle (-ing) form of a verb, while not passive, nevertheless should be used sparingly, largely because of repetition but also as a means to help readers visualize scenes.
  • Finally, sentences with construction similar to there is ... may look passive, but they aren't. The subject comes after the state of being verb, which adds to the impression that there's a passive something going on. But remember, with no action verb in sight, there is no possibility of a passive subject.

- - - - -

A former English teacher and an aspiring epic fantasy author, Rebecca LuElla Miller has been working as a freelance writer and editor since 2004. She has covered high school sports for a Los Angeles area newspaper group, published articles and short stories in several print and online magazines, and placed in the top twenty-five in the 2006 Writer’s Digest Short, Short Story contest. Most recently she is the author of Power Elements of Story Structure. She currently blogs Monday through Friday at A Christian Worldview of Fiction.

Her editing credits include non-fiction and fiction alike, most notably four titles in the Dragons in Our Midst and Oracle of Fire series by Bryan Davis and two novellas in the Mission League series by Jill Williamson. You can learn more about her editing services and read her weekly writing tips at Rewrite, Reword, Rework.


4 comments:

  1. Thank you for this post, Becky. It helped clarify the differences of passive voice for me. I worked so hard to eliminate "was" and my agent said it's okay to use it - like, when it's obvious I'm trying to eliminate "was." She said that's worse than using it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pam, your agent has identified one of the things that happens when we become a slave to writing "rules." The same thing is true, for example, when people try to avoid ending sentences with a preposition--sometimes the structure becomes so convoluted, it's hard to know what the sentence is saying, and it certainly doesn't sound like how people talk.

      But that's why we need critiques and edits--sometimes we don't hear the awkwardness ourselves. We're simply trying to do what we understand to be good writing practice.

      Glad this helped clarify passive for you, Pam.

      Becky

      Delete
  2. Even the actual, real, honest-to-God passive voice is a good thing when used correctly. The purpose of passive voice is to obscure (or at least take the focus off) the agent because A) he or she is not known or B) I don't want YOU to know who it is for some reason. Sometimes passive voice is used to avoid assigning blame/responsibility...which explains its popularity with politicians and lawyers. Over using it is deadly dull and can quickly become confusing. But avoiding it entirely is silly. All human languages have structures for doing these jobs (even Ergative-Absolutive languages which don't, strictly speaking make the same active/passive distinction) because they are necessary to human communication. (Well, except maybe Pirahã, but they don't do anything like the rest of humanity!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good points, Adam. I used passive voice in any number of notes to as a teacher.

      But you've also explained why passive voice is frowned upon in fiction. Novelists should know the agent and should want the reader to know who it is and should want to assign responsibility to that agent. Still, there are times and places where passive is right. The real rule of fiction is, If it works, it's right. ;-)

      Becky

      Delete